1. The artistry of the graphic picture dealing with the motion picture may not have much to do with your posting – but maybe the off topic of the picture got my attention as a diverting away from the broad title to click and look into excitement and view (not so much) – not attempting to insult… Just like an off topic attempt….It doesn’t appear intentional.
In the film – I disagree – he isn’t acting anynonmous – His intents are clear – be it an anarchist or classified as a conspiracy theorist – in the film – he is choosing to come across as a symbol of something greater within the scope of righteousness and justice as a result of his victimization – He is not silent nor anonymous – I must disagree and call the claim in vendetta of anonymous false. I can continue this further on a re-blog – so I’ll stop for the moment.
Let me just pull from one paragraph about the middle of the blog to comment on – and remark upon.
“On a fundamental level, Anonymous is an actualized idea of the potential for freedom, creativity and personal responsibility. It is an idea to which individuals can, and do, attribute their actions that they believe are in-line with the sentiments of the hive mind.”
“On a fundamental level”….it began to describe something cruel and call it anonymous….potential for freedom where it is already free is freedom – meaning where there is freedom there is freedom….An actualized idea? It is a reality it is offensive and a major wrong doing in saying otherwise. An actualized responsibility. No! An actual thing, an event, of current and past present future affairs as it has been and to be of great things which are. Creation of a problem is separate from the reaction to reconcile and get rid of the problem. This is the difference between the film and my grief with this piece or paragraph there of – (I really like to come across blogs I’d like which just aren’t pictures.)
So, something becomes more and more obvious throughout this piece….political affiliation, groups are separate from the wrong or incorrect of this piece referring to as the good piece anonymous….someone actually wrote, Liz –wrote “risky you posting” such and article about a large group. Well the risky part is the inaccuracy of what anonymous has been defined and accepted as – and the difference between an actual and true potential classifications available to referencing the specific classification to a separate definition. Anonymous is not just anyone is political. They make political decisions that literally make no sense whatsoever – ill informed individuals or not – you let them know – they still have errors in the decision makings of their claims of wanting worse for theirselves.
The attack here is out of line.
You don’t redefine it in this way or this format without the format or the pre-disposition of the reclaim or CLAIMing some separate artistry. I don’t like that this appears to defame true and great democratic principles with this…
This blog, referenced went political and cross the bridge and pretended not to. I am not anyone’s fool. Sentimentality is a good thing not to be confused with – the ridiculous pull away from the beauty of conceptualized ideal and realistic fantastic principles – some of which are here today. Your pull to literally is a wrong doing in many fashions. A fantastic – oh my gosh – we finally get this humane thing of additional back ups, no pain, no sorrow, no injury. No requirement of excessive hours of work, 39-45 hours a week. Just Work for leisure or hobby as part of a healthy humane program. We call them rich people with nothing to do, who might work part – time, quit, pick up hobbies here and there and so forth. At least one type, we call them people who do more and more and more – to hope fully reach a piece and grab their own humane things for theirself. The unjust part is did they require to massage their feet, and require rest due to the requirements (like monetary gains or other) to gain these things.
So, what was done-DID here was drastic and wrong – where is the explanation of humanity or righteousness. A picture of the film. You didn’t do that. The artists, the film-makers, the writers pieced the fantasticals together. Beauty doesn’t really go to garbage and call the crap beautiful. The original Beauty – would be beautiful. So, Anonymous – someone, not something.
People can be anonymous,. Also, OH, HOW ABOUT
a•non•y•mous
əˈnɒnəməsShow Spelled[uh-non-uh-muhs] Show IPA
adjective
1. without any name acknowledged, as that of author, contributor, or the like: an anonymous letter to the editor; an anonymous donation.
2.of unknown name; whose name is withheld: an anonymous author.
3. lacking individuality, unique character, or distinction: an endless row of drab, anonymous houses.
Now, they’d actually want real activists to be ticked off at oh- they are just anonymous people who cared which assist in assuring and/or did other great things to make sure people have basic and hopefully something that could be recognized for privilege and not confused for an advantage of something or privilege when it is just something regular, basic or not to be recognized as an extra thing to be thankful for. As in, an insult to claim one should be thankful for things that should and would just be automatic. The anonymous crap on this page is A bunch of curse word, B.S. – wrong crap would be.
So, anonymous, contributor – name witheld, lacking distinction. They – want me to curse at you THE people working toward the actual idea. The do NOT lack distinction, they are activists, they are involved they hold roles in official offices. These are specific. They are acknowledged for centuries. The things to get rid of is crap like what’s been doing with anonymous – isn’t the official roles which are specific with acknowledgement to elected roles! This twat! Ono this blog!
A role these political people play are separate. Anonymous is dealing with all sorts of things and subject matters – it is a broad generalization not to be pulled with something that is fantastic and/or specifically great or terrible and contains specific and broad terms to be referred to in the wrong manner calling it correct or vice versa ~ OR vice versa.
Re-blog Response, Written by: Rosette Jones
Leave a Reply